Sounds like ……

Rothschild Zionism is not a race or a people; it is a political philosophy in its public expression and at its core a global secret society with its agents in government and dictating to government the world over. It does not work for the best interests of Jewish people. Its goal is the enslavement of the global population – including the Jewish people that it falsely claims to represent.

~ David Icke

Icke is not an idiot – so what is going on? Shill, playing the game for personal gains, tip-toeing around delicate issues?

Leave a comment


  1. aj

     /  August 31, 2012

    Digger, the legit folks may be wrong in the early stages but they correct quickly and stay on the path.

    Icke ain’t it. Has begun to nibble at the Jewish problem, but not full on. Could he be used to ridicule the truth, absolutely.

    Like others, he’s useful it getting the sheep to pick their heads up and look around.

    He’s right about the Jew leadership being bad for average Jews, but that’s been the story forever. Seems abandoning Judaism is part of the answer.

    • aj,

      Abandoning Judaism seems to be the only answer – something which Gilad Atzman has worked out.

      Shame as other areas he talks some sense i.e. his nature of reality I think is spot on.

      Thanks for contributing.


  2. Cameron

     /  August 31, 2012

    I had faith that Icke would come out after sometime and completely speak the truth, but I fear that would never happen.

    • Cameron,

      I hear your thoughts. Yep, he is a half Truther. He may have been threatened, or having worked in the media is very Jew-wise and intuitively knows his career would be finished if he went the full hog. He may reason with himself (even in a cognitive dissonance way) that he is better to get 3/4 truth out there than be shut down/killed and get nothing out there. perhaps I’m being generous here. It’s such a damn shame. Because that’s how the conspiracy keep trundling along by people tip toeing around the edge.

      Thank you for contributing.


  3. Daniel Leach

     /  September 1, 2012

    Reblogged this on Blog! and commented:
    Rothschild Zionism is not a race or a people; it is a political philosophy in its public expression and at its core a global secret society with its agents in government and dictating to government the world over.

  4. Pat

     /  September 2, 2012

    Digger, I’ve been thinking about the issue of those who appear to be “half-truthers”, as you say. A quick reality check has revealed that “They” don’t want anyone who speaks the truth to reach a large audience. Those who have relatively large audiences are either inorganic controlled opposition plants or have been effectively compromised. That leaves us to other means and avenues towards reaching the public at large. I see the problem as multifaceted. Initially, we have a market demographic and segmentation problem complicated by varying degrees of system indoctrination. Any message will absolutely need to take into account the specific demographic and level of system indoctrination that person has suffered. Certainly, people who are followers of a particular religion present a specific system indoctrination problem. Ideally, the program of message dissemination would be self-sustaining and viral. I believe that the core problem that we fact is what Gottfried Feder called “The Thralldom of Interest”. Otherwise known as the practice of charging interest for the use of money – and related practices. The Jews obviously think its a vital issue as well due to the fact that they folded the practice into their religion to be used against all non-Jews…but never against a fellow Jew. This is where I suggest we take our arguments. No matter what particular manifestation of the Jewish Question that happens to be discussed at the time – the usury issue should form the punch line. All Jewish roads lead to usury.

    • Pat,

      Ohh yes the curse of usury banned in many cultures. The destructive weapon. However another HUGE aspect tied into usury is the concept of “The Person” our artificial entity which is created when we are registered as a baby. I wish more Truthers would really grasp the importance the person has on our lives. We have a person, but are not a person.

      For anyone who wants to research ‘the person’ concept, please see sidebar for “Freeman-on-the-Land” topics.

      Thank you for your intelligent contribution.


      • Pat

         /  September 2, 2012


        You are head and shoulders above the VAST majority out there. I wish it were so easy as to merely gaze over the heads of all the dolts to find you and people like you.

        Here is a little something for you that I think you may appreciate. It discuses who our real enemy is.

        The problems that you witness today associated with the evident destruction of your families, communities, cities and nation involve the fundamental propositions of politics, morals and metaphysics, including, ultimately, the nature and the purpose of man himself.
        What is going on here?
        Who is the enemy?

        Of the questions I have just posed, the one which goes to the root of the matter is “Who is ‘the enemy’,” and “Who are ‘we’.” The following seeks to illuminate the fact that “Globalists, Jews, and Communists” are all different terms for the same enemy that we face.

        Throughout American history, we have been told that we had certain enemies. Our government has told us that the German NSDAP was the enemy. Our government has told us the Communism was the enemy. Today, our government is telling us that “Muslim Extremists” and “Homegrown Terrorists” are the enemy.

        The above descriptions are obviously a mere sweeping generalization of opinion and generalizations about popular beliefs and convictions.

        But is any of what we were told true? Who told us who the enemy was? Why did they choose those particular enemies?

        According to the following analysis, the enemy is a group of Globalists, or, to be more precise, the few thousands or even hundreds who assist in the world-wide strategic planning of the Globalists, and the comparatively small number of persons of other nationalities who assist to carry out its policy.

        The antagonist of the Globalists is, whether they realize it or not, the rest of the inhabitants of the world.

        The conflict is a struggle to maintain the power and authority by the use of force and the control of all sources of knowledge and opinion and a struggle to impose similar systems on other nations, all subordinated to a single governing body, until the whole world is governed on this model.

        According to this interpretation, the fact that the dogmatic power-group opposing us happens to be in possession of the formal diplomatic and administrative machinery of the Government is a result of intentional corruption of the monetary system. The main consequence of which is that other governments, as well as individual persons, become protagonists in the conflict. The conflict between governments is secondary to the main conflict.

        This conflict is fundamental, because it is not primarily about rival political systems but about the nature of man and the purpose of his presence on earth.

        The struggle between the Globalists and the rest of the world is the practical, political manifestation of the true, fundamental conflict. The point at issue is simple, though many attempts have been made to confuse it.

        FREE – OR NOT FREE
        The conflict is about whether man is to be free to choose between positive alternatives or not: whether human problems are to be dealt with on their merits or according to allegedly infallible dogma; whether the decisions governing human life are to be arrived at publicly and carried out by common agreement, or secretly and forcibly imposed by the will of a small group.

        YES OR NO
        This is a conflict between absolutes, between Yes and No, and admits of no compromise whatsoever. The political point at issue that derives from this question of principle is whether a Globalist system of government is going to be extended to the whole world, or whether it is to be eradicated everywhere.

        On this plan also there is no possibility of compromise, but because it is a question of politics the time factor comes into it, and the period which may elapse before a clear-cut decision is reached one way or the other may be indefinitely prolonged. The two concise ways of stating the political point are first, that there is no possibility of a settlement with a Globalist government, or, secondly, that any settlement reached by a Globalist government with the Governments of the free world would be a tactical maneuver designed to further the long-term aim of world domination.

        If this viewpoint is correct, it may be summed up thus: The protagonists are, first, the Globalists and their associates, and second, the rest of the world. The contest is fundamental, and admits of no compromise. It involves governments, and it involves individuals. Therefore both governments and individuals have to take part in the operations which are necessary if the Globalist aim is to be frustrated.

        The proposition that the contest is between the Globalists and the rest of the world raises a number of issues. In the first place, there are obvious differences between the protagonists.

        On the one side is a completely unscrupulous dictator¬ship exempt from all moral law, maintaining itself in power primarily by the control of the armed forces and internal security apparatus, and by controlling all sources of knowledge and opinion of its subject peoples.

        This dictatorship has a clear-cut long-term aim—world domination; a detailed strategic plan and elaborately worked-out tactical methods for carrying it out. Originating as an international working-class movement with a strong idealistic element in its inspiration, it has for many years identified itself with Judaism and Jewish Nationalism.

        While it retains the traditional geographical interests of Israel— and principally the maintenance of friendly governments in the states on the West—its ambitions and interests are world-wide. It is merely an anachronism to speak of Jewish interests in geographical terms.

        And here I wish to emphasize one point which I will elaborate later. There is nothing whatsoever that is different in kind, or even novel, in the Globalist playbook. There is not an essential feature in its aims or methods, in its strategy, tactics, its arguments or its acts which has not already manifested itself at some point or another in human history. What is new in it is the application to government by dictatorship of various phenomena of modern life and technical development, which has had the following consequences: —

        1.) The growing complexity of modern society has vastly increased the importance of economics in political affairs. This has greatly confused the political issues involved, such as the concept of freedom, and has even led to the delusion that political questions are subservient to economics, instead of the other way round. This confusion has produced a number of new arguments to justify tyrannical acts.

        2.) The magnitude of the ambition (in geographical terms) is probably without precedent.

        3.) Modern scientific and technical development has made it much easier for a dictator to seize and retain control of large masses of people.

        4.) It is doubtful whether there has ever before been such a scientific, systematic or detailed study by politicians and their officials of the technique of seizing and retaining power or of the art of aggression without resort to war.

        One consequence of this blending of theory and practice (which is perhaps the nearest formal approach we have seen to the concept of the philosopher-king!) is that the dictatorial system has become depersonalized, so that it is tempting although not entirely accurate to say that the dictator is not a person but a doctrine.

        But even this development merely means that the political testament of one dictator was adopted, with important modifications, by his successor, and for this too there are precedents. But none of these things is a novelty, and the differences are differences of degree. And I suggest that all that is apparently new and seductive in Communism is merely an adaptation and a blending of doctrines and methods that are very ancient indeed.

        This of course does not mean, and I would not for a moment wish to suggest, that Communism does not appear attractive, or novel; that its appeal is not wide¬spread, or that we need not take it seriously.

        We certainly should, for its material inducements—peace, united world, social justice, material plenty, have won Soviet Russia a number of loyal adherents, despite the fundamental fallacies on which they are based. Moreover the Jewish operatives behind Communism have been very successful in exploiting the age-old trick of appealing to idealism by the manipulation of facts, in which it has been greatly assisted by the role in modern thought of the work of the Jew, Karl Marx (real name: Mordecai).

        We have certainly to take Communism, as an aid to dictatorship, very seriously indeed. But it is not the enemy, though its adherents are so closely linked to Jewish aims and methods that Jews, a more accurate phrase than Communism in this context, have to be included in the ranks of the enemy.

        In the US, the allies of the Globalists are: —

        (i) The leadership of the Army and Security Forces, including police.
        (ii) The senior US bureaucracy, especially those administering Justice, Trade Unions, Education, Publishing, the Press and Censorship.
        (iii) A small privileged class, or corps d’élite, consisting of highly paid scientists, technicians, &c., with a vested interest in the survival of the regime.
        (iv) A large, and under present conditions, overwhelming, proportion of the inhabitants of the US. Their support is mainly passive.
        (v) Certain allied governments around the world—all dependent in varying manners and degrees upon the US Government.
        (vi) Most members of Communist parties abroad (i.e., in the free world).
        (vii) A number of non-Communists in the free world, who sympathize with Jewish aims and ignore or condone its methods.
        (viii) An indefinite number of persons who may be well-informed or even specialists in their own sphere, but who, through abysmal ignorance of world politics and Jewish policies, readily serve as unwitting agents of Jewish/Globalist policy.

        These eight categories of ally are skillfully manipulated to serve Jewish/Globalist policy throughout the world, under close control by the Globalist leadership.

        I need not trouble you now with the familiar links in the chain from the Globalists to the man in the street, beyond emphasizing that Globalist policy is only partly concerned with relations with other governments and very much concerned with relations with the peoples behind the backs of their governments.

        This of course stresses the fact that the enemy in this context is the Globalist elite operating behind the cover of the religious doctrines of Judaism, operating through the two parallel but interlinked channels of (a) the administrative machinery (Government policy and the mass broadcasting media), and (b) the ostensibly non-official network spread out through the Jewish-controlled International Organizations and national political parties.

        Both channels are used for giving effect to Party policy, and of the two the official administrative machinery is probably the less important. At any rate, in the work of Globalist missions abroad the normal manifestations of official policy—the diplomatic notes, interviews and negotiations, are subsidiary to the task of co-operation with local non-governmental agencies, especially political parties, intelligence gathering, and some propaganda work.

        So much then for the nature of the Globalist enemy, the first protagonist. What is it trying to do?

        The long-term aim is the incorporation and absorption of more and more countries in the Globalist system, until it embraces the whole world. This aim would require many decades to achieve and as part of the long-term plan the Globalist dictatorship has certain definite objectives, as follows:—

        1.) It has to remain in power. There seems every prospect of it doing so, as long as it can seal off the people from any alternative viewpoint to its own and keep them reasonably contented, and has the strength to retain its satellites in a position of enforced or voluntary dependence, and as long as the people of the world take no effective measures against it.

        2.) It is building up the industrial and war potential of the Globalist bloc. Briefly, therefore, the second task is the consolidation of the Globalist bloc — the “springboard of the revolution.”

        3.) The Globalist dictatorship has to break up any combination of powers which might either threaten to attack it or to organize an effective resistance to further expansion. That is why you are seeing all of the military in the Middle East at the present time.

        Globalist methods are based on a not unrealistic assessment of human nature and of the sources of power and action. They are based entirely upon the assumption that the arrangement is one-sided: that while the Globalist Government through agencies under its control is free to influence opinion in the free world without serious impediment, no corresponding facilities shall exist to enable the opinions of the American people to be thus influenced.

        This fact has made it possible for the Globalists to build up a vast world-wide network designed to influence public opinion in the desired direction. There are two aspects of the problem, closely inter-connected.

        1.) Organization: the Globalists have had to recruit agents totally subservient to them to form the nucleus of the network. This has been largely though by no means exclusively composed of Jews.

        2.) A message or series of themes has to be propagated in order to obtain the desired reaction in the world. I have pointed out that the official diplomatic prong of Globalist policy is less important than the unofficial prong, the influencing of public opinion.

        This is because the Globalist rightly calculates that any government can only do what public opinion allows it to: therefore the obvious way of determining the policy of governments is to influence the public opinion which controls them.

        The Globalist network therefore covers all those sections of opinion which can exercise an important influence in a state either through their numerical strength and organization (e.g., organized labor) or through being in a key position (e.g., scientists and teachers). The precise story being propagated depends on the type of recipient, but the basis of all Globalist/Jewish propaganda is to select some universal emotion or trait of human nature and provide arguments to play upon it. Broadly speaking the emotions are: —

        (i) Fear. — The armed strength of the US is publicized, the size of the American/NATO bloc, the inevitability of its ultimate triumph.

        (ii) Love of Peace. — American/Jewish policy is portrayed as peace-loving, and all attempts to oppose it condemned as war-mongering and aggressiveness.

        (iii) Love of Unity and Size, and the Cult of Power.

        (iv) Love of Social Justice and Equality of Opportunity. — By giving a distorted version of society and by exploiting the acknowledged injustices in the world, an easy appeal is provided to all with a tender social conscience or a sense of personal grievance.

        (v) Perverted Christianity and Humanitarianism. — Here a judicious selection of facts and arguments is sufficient to exploit all those whose goodness of heart is scarcely matched by soundness of head.

        This list could probably be extended, but the basic picture is of a Jewish paradise which will inevitably triumph over a corrupt, decaying and doomed world. Much play is made of such phrases as progress, and the idealism, particularly among the working classes is skillfully exploited. There is no hesitation to pervert the meaning of words, to employ downright falsehoods and every trick known to persuade, mislead, confuse and throw into doubt and despair.

        In its detailed execution, the policy is to employ scientists to persuade scientists and to exercise a pseudo-scientific influence on laymen, for industrial workers to agitate among industrial workers, and so on. It is important that non-Jews should be induced to do as much of the persuading as possible, but where the work has to be done by Jews it is best if they appear not as Jews but as good-hearted men with the interests of their own community at heart.

        This is only a brief survey of the mass of Jewish tactical literature and factual evidence. I hope it will be apparent that there is nothing whatever new in it, except the scale on which it is being done, and the very close control which enables each section of this network to reflect faithfully each shift and tactical turn of Soviet policy.
        I should complete this section by emphasizing the rigid discipline and the fanatical self-dedication of the hard core which operates the network. The psychological ingredients of this fanaticism are complex and the motives which lead individuals down this path are various.

        I think it is fair to say that many young people flirt with the Jewish/Communist creed, but the flirtation only turns into something more serious if there is something basically wrong with them in the first place. Moreover, once they have adopted the creed most elaborate procedures have to be gone through to keep up their enthusiasm. It is thus a highly unnatural and unattractive mode of life although the difficulties of escaping from it are evidently formidable.

        I realize that I have left a great deal unsaid, but I hope that this sketch will describe sufficiently for our purposes the first protagonist.

        I have said earlier on that the antagonist of the Globalist is the rest of the inhabitants of the world, Jewish and non-Jewish alike, and I added the safe¬guarding clause “whether they realize it or not”.

        Briefly, therefore, we have to state that of the two protagonists the Globalist has a long-term plan, the power at home to carry it out, an organization abroad to assist it, an ideological driving force to sustain the effort and a well worked out strategy and tactics. The other protagonist, namely the governments and peoples of the world with many of the peoples of the Communist world, can, from its very nature, have none of these things.

        This analysis, on the face of it, points to the discouraging conclusion that the Globalist thesis is right and that in a matter of half a century the strength of the Globalist/Communist bloc will have grown so predominant that the free world will have only the choice of military defeat or political surrender.

        I hope I can show, however, that this is very far from being the case provided, and only provided, that a reasonable amount of courage and initiative is shown in the appropriate places, because the picture I have just painted is a materialistic one which leaves out of account a number of hidden resources in the free world, and ignores much that is being done and much more that can be done to defend ourselves and counter¬attack

        From the nature of the protagonists certain consequences seem inevitable.

        First, we have to face the fact that ultimately, in the very long run, this is a struggle to the end.

        The Globalists will either triumph or go under, and if we sincerely believe that a genuine compromise is possible, then it is we that shall go down.

        By that I mean, the Globalists will either be swept away in a counter-revolution, or be forced so to modify its structure and policy owing to human pressures within and without that it loses all its present characteristics.

        I further mean that appeasement, Christian charity, and a desire to improve Jewish/Globalist/Communist policy by setting virtuous examples in such matters as disarmament could guarantee not the ultimate modification but the ultimate triumph of the Globalist.

        Politically it will fatally weaken the opposition to the Globalist if we delude world opinion into thinking that this is a question of traditional power politics, and that disarmament, security, and plenty are just round the corner. But how many people in the free world under¬stand this, and in how many countries is it expedient or within the moral capacity of politicians to say so?

        Yet this seems to me to be the very first requirement; that the responsible leaders of opinion, particularly non-governmental, throughout the free world should understand the true nature of the conflict and its long-term implications, and influence its servant, namely the government, to base its policy, consistently and coherently, upon the long-term facts.

        We have to accept and encourage the idea that resistance to Globalist/Jewish/Communist policy is a universal interest, not an interest of one government or a group of governments.

        We have to dispel any idea that the fundamental issues, and the action that flows from them, are simply the business of governments and government-controlled agencies. Government-sponsored information, tendentious hand-outs, statements of opinion and all obvious attempts to influence free opinion are worse than useless, or should be.

        The idea has to be established that the defeat (and I repeat, the defeat) of Globalist/Jewish/Communist principles is the moral duty, and ultimately the interest, of any person in his capacity of human being.

      • Pat,

        Thank you for your kind words.

        What a piece – I will take some time to digest this slowly.

        Many thanks again for contributing.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: